Garter Snake Forum  

Go Back   Garter Snake Forum > General Info > The Garter Snake Lounge

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2007, 05:07 PM   #21 (permalink)
LushLulu85
netjer-ankh
 
LushLulu85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,781
Re: salmonella

james you tramp eyywww!
LushLulu85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 05:16 PM   #22 (permalink)
RZL36
Subadult snake
 
RZL36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shores of Jersey
Posts: 331
Re: salmonella

I paid someone to eat one and they did. Said it tasted terrible.
__________________
Rich
RZL36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 05:35 PM   #23 (permalink)
Charlet_2007
Adult snake
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 639
Re: salmonella

you all are disgusting lol altho i have ate my self no lieing squarrl brains, frog legs, bull testicals ( AKA rocky mountain oysters), and baby goat...
__________________
Thanks, *~Natalie Beacom~*
Phone# 417-676-0305
www.noahsarcreptilerescue.webs.com

http://dragcave.net/image/ZI9q.gif
Charlet_2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 06:02 PM   #24 (permalink)
GrapefruiTgirl
"First shed In Progress"
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 98
Send a message via MSN to GrapefruiTgirl
Re: salmonella

I'm inclined to think that by the same token as banning certain animals because they carry salmonella, they ought to ban chicken from the grocery store because of it, and pork too for risk of trichomoniasis worms burrowing into ones eyes while they sleep, after having cooked pork for supper and rubbed ones eyes afterwards without having washed their hands.
Also, I think that some chicken or pork that lays rotting and festering in the refrigerator would pose a far greater health hazard than the average reptile, under average circumstances

LOL, my two cents
GrapefruiTgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 06:04 PM   #25 (permalink)
RZL36
Subadult snake
 
RZL36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shores of Jersey
Posts: 331
Re: salmonella

People have told me about my snakes having salmonella. I've obviously took into account their words of wisdom and threw all my snakes in the garbage.
__________________
Rich
RZL36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Login to remove ads
Old 10-04-2007, 06:07 PM   #26 (permalink)
adamanteus
Moderator
 
adamanteus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire. (Near Manchester).
Posts: 8,907
Send a message via MSN to adamanteus
Re: salmonella

If we banned everything that might carry some unpleasant bacteria, we'd all have to live in a vacuum and eat paper.
__________________
James.
adamanteus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 07:03 PM   #27 (permalink)
Stefan-A
Moderator
 
Stefan-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Finland
Posts: 6,264
Send a message via MSN to Stefan-A
Re: salmonella

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrapefruiTgirl View Post
I'm inclined to think that by the same token as banning certain animals because they carry salmonella, they ought to ban chicken from the grocery store because of it, and pork too for risk of trichomoniasis worms burrowing into ones eyes while they sleep, after having cooked pork for supper and rubbed ones eyes afterwards without having washed their hands.
Also, I think that some chicken or pork that lays rotting and festering in the refrigerator would pose a far greater health hazard than the average reptile, under average circumstances

LOL, my two cents
Sort of depends on where you live, different countries have different standards when it comes to chickens, for example. Sweden for example has a complete zero tolerance policy regarding salmonella in chickens. Close to 0% of the chickens raised there carry the bacteria and less than 10% in the rest of the Nordic countries and Western Europe, compared to 90% of the reptiles (could be wrong , I only used one source).

Overall, we all seem to agree that the salmonella "threat" is exaggerated.
Stefan-A is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 07:33 PM   #28 (permalink)
GrapefruiTgirl
"First shed In Progress"
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 98
Send a message via MSN to GrapefruiTgirl
Re: salmonella

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan-A View Post
... Sweden for example has a complete zero tolerance policy regarding salmonella in chickens. Close to 0% of the chickens raised there carry the bacteria and less than 10% in the rest of the Nordic countries and Western Europe, compared to 90% of the reptiles (could be wrong , I only used one source).
Really?? That's news to me, seriously! I thought (mistakenly?) that raw chicken by its very nature contained salmonella. And accordingly, one should never eat raw chicken.
Does that mean that theoretically, one could eat raw Sedish chicken, and not get food poisoning?
Wow...
I think I'll stick with the cooked variety
GrapefruiTgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 07:57 PM   #29 (permalink)
Stefan-A
Moderator
 
Stefan-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Finland
Posts: 6,264
Send a message via MSN to Stefan-A
Re: salmonella

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrapefruiTgirl View Post
Really?? That's news to me, seriously! I thought (mistakenly?) that raw chicken by its very nature contained salmonella. And accordingly, one should never eat raw chicken.
Does that mean that theoretically, one could eat raw Sedish chicken, and not get food poisoning?
Wow...
I think I'll stick with the cooked variety
It varies a lot. Portugal and Poland had salmonella in about 77-80% of their chickens about a year ago, Spain somewhere around 90%. I think the US was somewhere between 20-30%, although that's probably old info.

Naturally, you should always assume that it contains salmonella and cook it properly. Undercooked chicken tastes awful anyway.
Stefan-A is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 08:15 PM   #30 (permalink)
MoJo
Juvenile snake
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 182
Re: salmonella

I would be shocked if 90% of reptiles carried salmonella. I would like to know where you got that statistic. Far more people who have reptiles would get salmonella.

Salmonella in NA is much more common in poultry and eggs. You are far more likely to get salmonella from uncooked/undercooked chicken or eggs or from the counters that they were prepared on!

The pork tapeworm, Taenia solium, does not burrow into eyes while you are sleeping! Humans get it by eating undercooked infected pork and part of the tapeworm's life cycle brings into the brain! It is there that the problems can occur because the larvae in the brain can cause seizures.

Trichomoniasis is a sexually transmitted protozoa.

Joanna
MoJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Login to remove ads
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 PM.


vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO
Copyright © 2006-8, Hobby Solutions Inc.