![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Welcome to the Garter Snake Forum. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content as well as create your very own Photo Gallery to share with others. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. So please, join today and help us build the best Garter Snake community around! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
|
Re: T. s. concinnus pics.
Maybe 'absent' is a slight exaggeration..... shall we say very poorly defined, and fading with each slough.
Here's a comparison... ![]() Male concinnus, with no clearly defined spots.. ![]() Male radix, showing more typical Thamnophis markings.
__________________
James. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|