I often wonder about this kind of info
I mean, all this stuff about nutritional superiority of foods they'd hardly eat in the wild - despite the lack of which they don't end up deformed like some of the animals we see in captivity
if newborns and babies live on small slugs, worms and tadpoles in the wild, shouldn't pinkie bones be quite a step up from that in calcium supply?
I mean, they do have bones, however soft, unlike above prey