Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Forum Moderator Stefan-A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern Finland
    Posts
    12,389
    Country: Finland

    Re: Taxonomic changes: T. elegans

    A related question, after seeing several photos of the different T. elegans subspecies: Is it my imagination, or is T. elegans elegans much more slender than vagrans and the subspecies formerly known as terrestris?

  2. #2
    It's all about the Fuzzies jitami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,337
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic changes: T. elegans

    I think so Stefan, but I'm only going from pictures. I was actually worried that my elegans was too thin for a while, but he eats well and I'm actually thinking he's a little "fat" right now, even though he's still looooong and slender.
    Tami

    Oh. Because you know, it seems to me that, aside
    from being a little mentally ill, she's pretty normal.

  3. #3
    It's all about the Fuzzies jitami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,337
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic changes: T. elegans

    Thought you might enjoy this pic of a not so slender girl! She's got to be about ready to pop!


    Photo found here: Mather Field Vernal Pools - Garter Snake
    This local is about 30 minutes from my house and where Sly was found.
    Tami

    Oh. Because you know, it seems to me that, aside
    from being a little mentally ill, she's pretty normal.

  4. #4
    "Preparing For Third shed" Steven@HumboldtHerps's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Eureka, CA (Humboldt County)
    Posts
    402
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic changes: T. elegans

    Ahh yes! Taxonomy and the vanity of coining new names or erasing old ones!
    I am completely in agreement with the fact that we need to rewrite the Thamnophis family tree in accordance with the cladistic approach. The problem for me taking any current changes seriously is that there have been quite a few mitochondrial DNA studies done on the genus, and so many of them seem to contradict one another. A good friend of mine (who is a local wildlife biologist) mentioned that too few loci have been examined, and that the real reason we haven't solved the garter conundrum is because the genus as a whole has not been completely mapped. This is of course a grand undertaking, and I don't see any funding for such an endeavor any time soon.

    I do not have a problem of reassigning terrestris back to the elegans elegans clade, for I have seen some pretty obvious "intergrades". The whole concept of sub-species is becoming rather controversial these days, and many taxonomists would prefer the term "race". Additionally, even species statuses are coming into question. I mean if a CA King and a Corn Snake can produce fertile female "Jungle Corns" (an inter-generic hybrid), what the heck is the definition of a species?!

    I agree that terrestris would be closer to the Mountain Garter due to the fact that vagrans ranges further north and east.

    There is also a local genetic study that alleges more recent common ancestry between ordinoides, elegans, and atratus. Some suspect hybridization between elegans elegans and atratus. I suspect hybridization between sirtalis infernalis and elegans terrestris in our area (crazy, heh? It's one of the reasons I have chosen to return to school, so I can "spit in the eye" of some of the arrogant PhD's I have met! LOL! Sorry....

    But, hey! Everyone! Do not be discouraged by such news! To me it is still a Coast Garter - with different patterns, colors, and habitats.

    The is a conservational danger to eliminating certain subspecies or races. If they all become one species, certain localities could come under fire by development, etc. Offenders might say, "There's plenty of them elegans in the mountains; these "Coastals" can make way for some condos near the beach! Tsk! Tsk! The horror!

    Ponderously,

    Steven

  5. #5
    In Hog Heaven
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    2,140
    Country: United States

    Re: Taxonomic changes: T. elegans

    Yeah. What he said.
    2.0 NY Eastern Garters; Peepers, Jeepers
    3.1 Western Hoggies; Kenabec, Niizh, Kokopelli, Anasazi
    3.0 Puget Garters; Kunikpok, Tungortok, 'Rockster
    1.0 Eastern Milk; Carmello

Similar Threads

  1. T+ Elegans???
    By MasSalvaje in forum General Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 02:10 AM
  2. T.elegans
    By Hollis_Steed in forum General Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-30-2010, 08:56 PM
  3. elegans TERRESTRIS
    By aSnakeLovinBabe in forum General Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-21-2010, 02:27 AM
  4. Taxonomic discussion
    By Zephyr in forum General Talk
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 11-12-2008, 01:01 PM
  5. anyone breeding T. elegans. elegans
    By sschind in forum For Sale/Trade/Adoption
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 12:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •